💰 FOLLOW THE MONEY
Who funds the voices that shape public opinion? Every news source, podcast, and influencer has financial backers whose interests may influence editorial direction. This tracker maps ownership chains, revenue models, and funding sources — across the full spectrum — so you can evaluate motives alongside messages.
How scores are calculated: Transparency scores (0-100) measure how easy it is to trace where a source's money comes from — not whether the source is "good" or "bad." High scores mean open books; low scores mean opaque funding. Revenue breakdowns use the most recent SEC filings, nonprofit 990s, public financial statements, and investigative journalism where direct disclosures are unavailable. Lean indicators reflect editorial positioning as assessed by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media, and Media Bias/Fact Check — all of which use multi-partisan review panels.
⚠️ Dark Money in Media — Both Sides
Dark money flows across the political spectrum. On the right: Donors Trust/Donors Capital Fund funneled $1B+ to conservative media since 2010. On the left: Arabella Advisors' network moved $1.6B+ through liberal nonprofits in 2020 alone. In both cases, original donors are shielded from public view. The problem isn't left or right — it's opacity. When you can't see who's paying, you can't evaluate the motive.
Data compiled from SEC filings, FEC records, IRS 990 nonprofit returns, OpenSecrets archives, Columbia Journalism Review, Ad Fontes Media, AllSides, Media Bias/Fact Check, and public financial disclosures. Revenue figures are estimates from most recent available data. Transparency scores measure funding disclosure clarity, not editorial quality. Lean indicators reflect multi-source assessments. Last updated: March 2026.